Alcohol ban long time coming.

It’s almost no surprise that the most common reaction from netizens about the proposed law to ban public consumption of alcohol in public places from 1030pm to 7am is outrage and torrents of verbal abuse hurled towards the law makers.

 bingedrinking3_tnp

I’m in the age group that this law is most probably targeted towards – early 20s, and always pre-drinking outside Zouk and Clarke Quay because all my peers are too broke to afford to buy drinks inside establishments. Having said that, I can see the benefits of the law, even if I hate it on the sole basis of having to pay more for alcohol or finding alternative places to drink.

20131219_drunks_tnp_0

It’s really a long time coming. Earlier last year we’ve seen and heard complaints from residents near Jiak Kim Street (where Zouk is located) about the noise and mess that revellers make three times a week. Barring that, any person can just take a walk on the alleys behind Zouk to find puddles of vomit, leftover liquor bottles, melted ice, empty cigarette boxes and upended plastic cups strewn all over the place.

It is the anti-social behaviour that the Bill is seeking to curb.

Anti-public drinking and intoxication laws are common, especially in Asia. For instance, public drunkenness is illegal in Japan, and drinking in public is illegal in India. It remains to be seen, however, if this law in Singapore is going to be a law that will be strictly enforced. Similarly, it is technically illegal to drink in public in both the United Kingdom and United States, but these laws are rarely strictly followed unless the person in question is acting disorderly.

Perhaps the timing of this Bill could have been better. After all, it’s been a scarce few months since the banning of shisha was made legal, and many citizens are still up in arms about how Draconian and controlling the government seems to be. While reactions would still undoubtedly be negative, citizens would probably be more accepting if it didn’t come so hot on the heels of the shisha ban.

And why not? If you get protection by the law from a fierce dog and their owners, why not be accorded the same protection from an unpredictable drunk?

 

 

You might also like

        »  10 Running/Cycling Events you need to check out in 2015
        »  Entertainment: The Way We Go (20th – 29th November 2014)
        »  Managing money for retirement
        »  Your letters: My friend terminated from job for being pregnant
        »  AirAsia X troubled by staff payments

 

 

 

About the author

Audrey Kang

Audrey Kang is a born and bred Singaporean girl about to embark on a two year solo life abroad to study Politics and International Relations at the University of Melbourne. She’s maniacal about reading and writing and will write almost everything from sports to travel to current affairs, and will even read the back of a milk carton if she’s bored enough.

View all posts

4 Comments

Share your thoughts!