Breaking down but more reliable

Let’s break down this article.

RISE IN MAJOR BREAKDOWNS BUT MRT GETS MORE RELIABLE: LTA

That’s the headline that Straitstimes had. It doesn’t seem like a logical statement as it’s a contradicting statement. How can a rise in major breakdowns equate to things becoming more reliable?

train4

It’s very much like scoring 1/20 on your spelling test in primary school but selling it as a great improvement from 0/20. Whilst it is an improvement, we wouldn’t be telling anyone about it. So LTA and Straitstimes let’s just run through this article briefly.

There were 14 major breakdowns on the MRT network last year – an increase of 40 per cent from the previous year, the Land Transport Authority announced on its website yesterday.

An increase in breakdown from the previous year, that’s not positive and it’s the opening sentence.

Meanwhile, the number of such breakdowns, each lasting more than 30 minutes, on the LRT system nearly quadrupled to 15.

It has quadrupled! That’s 4 times more! Still not positive here.

As for the LRT system, the problematic Bukit Panjang LRT, which has broken down repeatedly since day one in 1999, chalked up 10 major incidents – up from two in 2014.

Despite the big breakdowns, the rail system was more reliable than it has been since 2011.

It has broken down since day 1, but you’ve improved it slightly. It’s still problematic, it has still chalked up 10 major incidents but it did better than 2011.

So that means you did better on the same test you did in Primary 3 when you retook it in Sec 1.

Dr Walter Theseira, an economist at SIM University, said: “The overall picture is that rail reliability is steadily improving. However, it’s unfortunate that major breakdowns, which tend to inconvenience commuters to a much greater extent, have not improved in recent years.”

What? It is a little more than unfortunate, especially if we’re bringing luck into the fray.

But here’s what Dr Walter Theseira was talking about when he spoke about improvements.

Last year, a train clocked an average of 133,000km before a delay of more than five minutes occurred. This was up from 93,000km in 2014 and 58,000km in 2011.

Nevertheless, the 133,000km is still less than half the distance clocked by Hong Kong’s MTR trains between delays.

Of the various lines, the North-East Line was the most reliable, averaging 213,000km between delays.

Mileage…a (singular) train clocked 133,000km before a delay struck. That’s not a saving grace people.

“I believe the public does understand this and will accept a low, but not zero, level of breakdowns in the system. However, I think what disturbs the public is the fact that some breakdowns could have been avoidable.”

Do you even take the train bro?

train3

So no, the MRT has not made improvements and yes the trend is worrying.

The headline should have been “Rise in major breakdowns, MRT should get more reliable: the commuters”.

Must reads

        »  Breaking down but more reliable
        »  Chan Chun Sing explain plans to guard against economical slowdown
        »  Discrimination in Japan against Mothers
        »  Interview with Mr.Bubble-man: It’s more than just bubbles
        »  The Singaporean: A complaining creature

About the author

The Editor

Hello, I am the Editor of FiveStarsAndAMoon :)

View all posts

Share your thoughts!