Does it matter what you call disabled people?

A recent Straits Times opinion letter by Justin Lee says we’ve been too busy giving disabled individuals “politically-correct” labels, instead of changing our attitudes towards them.



In excerpts taken out of the article, Justin says:

The term “retarded” was originally a neutral one – intended to replace derogatory terms such as “moron” or “imbecile”

society’s constant search for new euphemisms is ultimately pointless. The problem is not with words but with attitudes.

A wheelchair user I spoke to … (said) the act of overly heroicising a mundane activity became patronising, even condescending. The individual told me: “If I win a medal in the Para Games, I can be called an inspiration, but not for taking the bus to work.”

Are we so uncomfortable with disability that we only focus on the positive parts, dress it up, and distract ourselves from its realities, which could be negative and inconvenient for the disabled?

We should instead recognise that people have multiple identities and that their disability is but one of these identities.

It is timely that Justin raised questions about how Singapore addresses the way it “includes” the disabled, because changing our labels for disabled people is like winning the battle but losing the war if we fail to change our mindsets about disabled and special-needs people.

About the author

Jules Of Singapore

I’m Jules, from Singapore. I live and work here, and although it’s a great place to be, I feel there are many issues swept under the carpet. I’m also hoping to meet other women (and men) who actively want to discuss and further the interests of women who make up half our population, but whose voices are not amplified enough.

View all posts

Share your thoughts!