ย ย ย Sunday, July 5, 2026

A Magazine About Singapore . Since 2011

๐Œ๐ข๐ ๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ญ ๐–๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ƒ๐จ๐งโ€™๐ญ ๐‘๐ž๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐ž๐ž๐ ๐’๐ข๐ง๐ ๐š๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ž ๐€๐ง๐ฒ๐ฆ๐จ๐ซ๐ž

In late June, around 400 migrant workers employed by KPA Engineering and SK Industries reported going without pay for at least two months.

The Singapore Ministry of Manpower has since launched investigations into possible breaches of employment law.

NTUC Singapore, through the Migrant Workers' Centre, responded quickly by providing emergency financial assistance and identifying new employment opportunities with 40 companies offering around 150 vacancies.

It would be apt for us to take care of them, because Singapore is no longer the only attractive destination for migrant workers anymore.

Malaysia, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea and the Gulf states are all competing for labour from many of the same source countries. Workers today are increasingly informed about the opportunities available to them.

They compare salaries, working conditions, legal protections and how workers are treated before deciding where to go.

Information also travels remarkably quickly.

Within days, a case in Tuas or Jurong can become common knowledge in Dhaka, Chennai or Chittagong.

๐ˆ๐Ÿ ๐’๐ข๐ง๐ ๐š๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ž ๐ฐ๐ž๐ซ๐ž ๐ญ๐จ ๐ ๐š๐ข๐ง ๐š ๐ซ๐ž๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ญ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฐ๐š๐ ๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐Ÿ๐ญ, ๐š๐›๐š๐ง๐๐จ๐ง๐ž๐ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฐ๐ž๐š๐ค ๐ž๐ง๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐œ๐ž๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ, ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐š๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐œ๐ก๐จ๐จ๐ฌ๐ž ๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ ๐๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ก๐ž๐ซ๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ฒ ๐›๐ž๐ฅ๐ข๐ž๐ฏ๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ซ๐ž๐œ๐ž๐ข๐ฏ๐ž ๐›๐ž๐ญ๐ญ๐ž๐ซ ๐ญ๐ซ๐ž๐š๐ญ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ.

That would leave Singapore facing an uncomfortable reality: who do the work?

Someone must still build our HDB flats, maintain our MRT lines, repair our roads, clean our estates, work in our shipyards and support many of the industries that keep the country functioning.

Our physical infrastructure depends on a stable and willing migrant workforce.

This is why reputation should be viewed as a form of economic infrastructure. We often speak about efficient ports, political stability and a trusted legal system as reasons businesses invest in Singapore. The same principle applies to labour.

๐ˆ๐ง๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ข๐ง ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ, ๐ข๐ฌ ๐š๐ง ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐’๐ข๐ง๐ ๐š๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ž ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ๐ž๐ฅ๐Ÿ.

When MOM investigates errant employers or when NTUC steps in to provide immediate support and job matching, they are not only protecting vulnerable workers. They are protecting the reliability of systems that every Singaporean depends on.

The KPA Engineering case will eventually be resolved. We have established legal and dispute mechanisms, such that the many NGOs can do little but point them there.

The workers may find new employers, unpaid salaries may be recovered, and those responsible may be held accountable.

But the larger challenge remains. Singapore is competing not only for investments and businesses, but also for the people who build, maintain and support the nation.

Our competitive advantage cannot rest solely on wages. It must also rest on trust.

They are long-term investments in Singapore's resilience and competitiveness. If we lose the trust of the workers who build and maintain this country, we lose far more than labour.

We risk weakening one of the foundations upon which Singapore's economy is built.